KN 75 Street, Nyarugenge, Kigali
info@ur.ac.rw
Apply now
Take Survey
Login
Sign Up
Home
Our Programmes
Search Programme Details
Campus Locations
FAQ
DTLE
Admission Letter
Module Evaluation Form
Student Evaluation of Teaching and Learning (SETL)
Please provide your feedback by filling in the form below.
Identification
Timestamp
1. Your Academic Status
Undergraduate
Postgraduate
2. What is your gender?
Male
Female
Other
3. Student with disability?
No
Yes
4. If Yes, what is the type of your disability
5. Choose your Campus
--Select--
Huye
Nyarugenge
Rukara
Busogo
Gikondo
6. Choose your year of study
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
7. Choose the Module to evaluate
Evaluation Criteria (Rate 1–5)
Module Content and Organisation
The learning outcomes were clear
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The module workload was manageable
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The module was well organized (timely access to materials, notifications, etc.)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Student's Contribution
I participated actively in the module
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I was not given a chance to participate in this module
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
I did not pay much attention to learning in this module
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Teaching and Learning
There was a good balance of learning and teaching methods
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The module Lecturer was always punctual and helpful
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The language of instruction (English) was appropriate and adequate
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Lectures/seminars/workshops were well-linked
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Classroom and Laboratory spaces were satisfactory
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Learning Resources
Learning materials were relevant and useful
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Recommended reading was relevant and appropriate
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Provision of learning resources in the Library was adequate and appropriate
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Provision of electronic learning resources was adequate and appropriate
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Quality of Delivery
The module stimulated my interest and thinking on the subject area
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The progress of the module delivery was appropriate
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Ideas and concepts were presented clearly
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Assessment
The amount & variety of assessment was reasonable
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Feedback on assessment was timely and helpful
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Continuous assessment was regularly administered
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Overall Experience
I am happy with my experience of this component of this module
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
What did you like most about the module?
What didn't you like about the module?
Feedback on diversity and non-discrimination
Submit Evaluation
